N-C-I-S is Falling Down, Falling Down, Falling Down


By T.L. HEADLEY, MBA, MA, MAT, BA377644_3130500800304_374421729_n
For those asking what happened to the writers on NCIS in the last year or so – let’s use Occam’s Razor to solve the problem — which of course is that the simplest answer is usually right.
So the writers haven’t changed. Most of the actors haven’t changed. There have only been two significant changes to the show that was incredibly well-written and well-acted — the loss of Cote de Pablo and the entrance of Emily Wickersham.
So applying Occam’s Razor to the issue, that means the reason why the show seems flat and often downright uninteresting probably lies in those two factors.
Many people want de Pablo to return to the role of Ziva. I am one of them. Some just want Wickersham replaced because they think the show falls flat around her character. And of course there are some who genuinely like Wickersham — maybe they share some personality traits or they just like the character. I can’t understand it but it appears to be fact. However then there are the radical anti-Cote/anti-Ziva people who troll the show’s news and who have complained about her for eight years and now attack anyone who utters one word for Cote. Personally, I think they have issues with Israel and are probably at their core anti-Semitic. I dismiss this group outright.
But I would argue that MOST people sense that the show has gone flat and is not to the quality that it was. It has, indeed, lost a lot in ratings and audience as people tune out and find other shows.
I watch NCIS occasionally when I can find nothing else on TV or Hulu. As someone who has watched this group of series since the first episode of JAG, I am angered by what I see as the callous attitude apparently displayed by the people running NCIS — Mark Harmon and Gary Glasberg.
As someone who has business experience, I recognize the cold calculation that a product (show) has entered its “cash cow” phase of marketing — nearing the end of its product life, costs are cut, quality suffers and the product runs a few cycles on its “reputation” which is milked for all the profits the company can make. Sadly, I think that is what NCIS has become — a “Cash Cow” for its producers and CBS. And that is a shame.
Now, I want to turn to the issue of what made NCIS great for so long….
I have heard it described by many as a “police procedural.” And in some ways that is an accurate description, however solving cases is not what the show has historically been abou
t except for the first year or so.
What made NCIS great was that it was a psychological drama about a highly dysfunctional “team/family” that explored in depth the things that made each character tick. From the loss of Gibbs’ wife and daughter, his bout with depression and his continuing angst with relationships, to the growth of McGee and his interactions and sibling rivalry with Tony, to Ziva’s deep psychological scars, somehow balanced by the bright and bubbly Abby and wise old Grandpa Ducky — yet both were also holding a lot of deep-seated issues tightly within.
This psycho drama was played out against the backdrop of a police procedural , but that was all the cases were — a canvas against which to paint the story of these peoples’ lives.
They have moved away from the deep writing — either losing their focus or simply taking the lazy way and just making the show about solving the case. This means NCIS today is no different than the scores of other “police procedurals” that come and go each year.
THAT is why to many of us this past year and a half has seemed flat and seemed to be drifting aimlessly toward a series end.
Maybe they want to bring it to an end. Maybe they have just lost sight of what made them just a little better than the other “police procedurals.” Either way, they are falling down and the ratings show it. There is no BUZZ about NCIS today. There is no sense left that it is “must see TV.” What is left is habit. It is the fact that for 11 seasons Tuesday night has been NCIS night. It is a sense of loyalty to those who remain on the show – who ironically serve as constant reminders of the quality we came to expect of the show.
And every so often, like last Tuesday, when the Vietnamese man shook Gibbs’ hand, we are reminded of what was.
No, it isn’t just the loss of de Pablo. It is the sense of rudderlessness that permeates the episodes now. It is the sense of loss — and the sense that it is all unnecessary.
Bringing de Pablo back would give the show a new lease on life, but even that wouldn’t solve the problem unless they — Mark Harmon and Gary Glasberg — take a step back, watch a few old shows and think about what is different. And then admit that there are problems and take the steps necessary to fix them. The first of which is to get de Pablo back and the second is to get a couple of the writers back who know how to write for these characters — and who have proven they won’t “take the easy way out.”
Otherwise, what I was saying about NCIS being nothing more than a “cash cow” being milked by the producers and the network with one foot in the cancellation door, is proven true.

9 thoughts on “N-C-I-S is Falling Down, Falling Down, Falling Down

  1. This is almost word for word how I have felt! The crimes of the week we’re merely the catalysts to create interaction opotunies to bring us more of our A Team. It’s now looking kinda B or C as to entertainment value. It was the characters that drew me along with good stories and magic, memorable moments. I hate the smugness and disdain from Gary and Mark. They seem uncaring about what the bulk of fans really want. Boring Bishop, weidly written Tony, and Gibbs, Gibbs, Gibbs in the center is NOT what we wathen to see. Yes, I a proud TIVA and Ziva fan, I found her character complex, refreshing and boldly written. The Tony Ziva moments were special, the two characters both grew through their time together and we got to see different pieces of thrm. Bishop is not only not entertaining or int r resting, she’s hard to watch. The team is hard to watch with het. She so does not belong, and it throws it all off.
    Look what they done to my song, Ma.

  2. You must have read my mind. You said it eloquently. We don’t need another crime drama. The backstory of the characters and how they interacted with each other is what we loved. Most importantly the characters need to be interesting. What is so frustrating is that it still can be fixed. But as you said it’s not about the show they’re presenting to the fans. It’s about money now. So sad.

  3. Yeah, you’re right. For me, however, the purpose of the show was Gary Glasberg keep the show as a “cash cow”, from season eight, that’s when I started to lose interest by show. You might notice it more than anyone he “toyed with the Tiva thing” with fans. If you notice well, what he does since it came on the show is how to sew a quilt, scenes that were loved by the public, as the entry of Ziva (a woman) in the men’s room, for example. The movement of Tony himself in Present, Past and Future was a cheap copy of Truth or Consequence, episode of the show icon.
    Since the departure of Pablo it was announced I felt that the show – at that time – was losing “their goose that lays the golden eggs” – the couple Tiva. But still kept hopes to forget – probably for desire the show to get it right – that whoever was ahead of the show was Glasberg. Until watch PPF. In this moment I knew I could not follow the program in any way. For just missing the element of enchantment you put so well at the beginning of your text: the psychological drama about a highly dysfunctional team / family. Those who followed Gibbs and all his despair over the death of Kate, can not “swallow” Gibbs that not one dealt with the departure of Ziva, much less who plays “the good guy guilty for the way he treated his female agentes” – this argument to me, was the nail in the coffin if I still had any doubt that watching the show regularly or not.
    Glasberg turned visceral characters in maudlin characters. It is a show to be watched of habit and probably even sleep in front of the TV.

  4. The negative vibe toward the Ziva character and TIVA pairing, esp by Mark Harmon in his Gibbs geise was a last nail on the coffin. The destruction of the team-as-family premise took away what made this show unique. Who needs a show that’s just another procedural. And Bishops as ho hum a character as it gets, as dull as white chalk.

  5. Excellently well put. I have to say that for me the biggest change was between seasons 9 and 10. Whilst not perfect I still enjoyed the show. Then arrived season 10 and for some completely unknown reason – as far as I can see the writers, including Gary Glasberg as showrunner who I understand took over from Shane Brennan at the start of season 8 are pretty much the same – it became a different show. Maybe the show was catching up with the loss of Jesse Stern at the end of season 8 – I don’t know. I’m not saying that the SB days were perfect, but they certainly were a great deal more entertaining. All I do know is that the season 10 scripts were slow (must have had about a third of the pages) and as a result even the actors started to speak slower – no doubt to eek out the time… Gibbs spent the majority of the season in a foul mood, and Gibbs and Tony apparently had some unexplained falling out since Gibbs either shouted at or ignored Tony for the majority of the season. On top of which I dubbed it the season of missed opportunities – not only did GG continue to sit on the fence teasing the whole Tiva relationship which had long since passed from being enjoyable into enormously frustrating, but the season 9 cliffhanger amounted to a damp squib and as for the Tiva car crash. What a waste of an exciting (and I would suggest expensive) SFX. The PTB spent pretty much the whole of season 11 blaming poor scripts on the loss of Cote de Pablo. I appreciate the changes required in order to accommodate her loss would initially have been challenging but after that it should have made little or no difference. We’re talking a professional team of writers here – making last minute changes should be par for the course. And now into season 12 – it’s okay, but for the most part it’s just boring. Right from the start the show has been character lead. What we want to see is the interaction between our favourite characters. There have been some good stories, but instead of working their issues out as a team, they go it alone. There’s nothing for the team to pull together against, there’s no antagonist. And now that everyone just loves everyone else: Gibbs seems happier (not necessarily a bad thing); Tony loves McGee and vice versa; Vance is nice; there’s no Trent Kort and everyone loves Bishop – where’s the tension? Where as DiNozzo would have put it is the “pah”? There’s no texture. To me it’s like a rough pencil drawing that someone has forgotten to finish and add colour. And on the subject of DiNozzo – what happened to him? Up until the end of season 9 he had his good and bad moments, but for the most part he was a competent agent. From season 10 he turned over night into at times a complete idiot. No wonder Gibbs spent half his time being mad at him! So I found myself pretty much purely watching for the Tiva scenes – if for no other reason than the fact that for the most part during those scenes he was a reasonably sensible human being. And then of course CdP left and with the odd exception all we had left was the idiot. The writers seemed to have forgotten how to write Tony who’s personality completely changed from week to week. A long time ago Gibbs said that Tony hid behind the face of a clown. He didn’t say he was one! However, The Admiral’s Daughter at the end of season 11 gave me hope for season 12, but every time we get a vaguely decent Tony episode we are once again faced with an episode like The Searchers. I’m not saying he can’t be funny, but there’s a big difference between smart humour and silliness and forever throwing his character away for the sake of a quick one liner. We are supposed to like this character, right? If I hear him again fretting about cats, or indeed chops & casseroles (S11) I may finally have to once and for all throw in the towel. I understand that as shows progress they ultimately become more and more expensive, but that’s no excuse for lazy writing and a complete lack of excitement, passion, emotion, imagination and an absence of jeopardy. Without consequences there’s no jeopardy and without jeopardy there’s no excitement. Maybe someone needs to send them the season 1-4 box set DVDs to remind them just how it should be done. Had GG been in charge during the days of SWAK I have no doubt that Tony would have “gotten lucky” as Gibbs is so fond of saying these days and would never have contracted the plague. I’d long wondered if GG had actually viewed the early seasons and was sadly convinced to the contrary when Pride in the GG written episode of NCIS-NOLA announced that Tony had had “bubonic” rather than as any fan will tell him “pneumonic” plague! Ho hum…… I read somewhere that NCIS is a show to do the ironing by. How sad…. Forgive me for the rather long ramble….once I started it kinda got out of hand …. 🙂

Leave a comment